Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-554816

Opposes rescissionPosted October 5, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “Protect the national forests and wildlife refuges”
    • “KEEP the roadless rule in place”
    • “NO VALID reason to end the roadless rule”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “parks were not set up to benefit commercial or investment speculator interests”
    • “nor for sports games”

The comment

Protect the national forests and wildlife refuges. Ther is NO VALID reason to end the "roadless rule." The parks were not set up to benefit commercial or investment speculator interests nor for sports games. We much KEEP the roadless rule in place. Sincerely, D. M. Smith, Athens, GA 30606

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless