Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-557190

Opposes rescissionPosted October 5, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Governance Policy Process
- “without a single public meeting”
- “without weighing what that means”
- “proposes to rescind”
Recreation Tourism Public Use
- “trails in Pisgah National Forest are part of my life”
- “I hike there three to four times a month”
- “places like Craggy Mountain and Laurel Mountain”

What it names

National Forests: Pisgah National Forest
Roadless areas: Craggy MountainLaurel Mountain

The comment

Re: Rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule, Docket FS-2025-0001 The trails in Pisgah National Forest are part of my life. I hike there three to four times a month, and I am filing this comment because the Forest Service proposes to rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule without a single public meeting and without weighing what that means for places like Craggy Mountain and Laurel Mountain, two inventoried roadless areas in the Pisgah that I know on the ground.