Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-559274

Opposes rescissionPosted October 5, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

Roadless areas
Middle Fork

The comment

I support preserving intact watersheds for clean drinking and agricultural water, safeguards to wildlife habitats, Backcountry recreation, avoiding the up to 4x higher increase in potential wildfire opportunities, in areas of cultural significance to native tribes including the black feet. I want us to continue to protect the badger to medicine area, the national forest land along the two, and the middle fork, the jewel and the swN. What makes this area of Montana unique is exactly all of these things.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless