Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-560430

Opposes rescissionPosted October 5, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “depend on these watersheds for clean drinking water”
    • “integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “avid users and advocates for our nation's public lands”
    • “hike the backcountry trails”
    • “frequently visit Craggy/Big Ivy, South Mills River-Laurel Mountain”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “value the pristine wildlife habitats they support”
    • “Protecting these unfragmented landscapes”

What it names

Roadless areas
Laurel MountainSouth Mills River

The comment

To the U.S. Forest Service: We are writing to express our strong opposition to any efforts to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. As avid users and advocates for our nation's public lands, we rely heavily on the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. We frequently visit Craggy/Big Ivy, South Mills River-Laurel Mountain, Graveyard Fields, the Black Mountains, and Linville Gorge near our home in Asheville, N.C. Protecting these unfragmented landscapes is deeply personal to us because we depend on these watersheds for clean drinking water, hike the backcountry trails, and value the pristine wildlife habitats they support. We urge the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to abandon the proposed rescission and instead maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment. Sincerely, Hanne & Glen Miska

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless