Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-562084

Opposes rescissionPosted October 5, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

The comment

Dear U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz, I’m writing to urge you to choose Alternative 1 and keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact. I live next to the Chiricahua Mountains and travel within them frequently. There are abundant reasons not to change a status quo that has worked very well, but I wish to underscore that the Forest Service already is trying to add roads within the forest while it is failing to maintain adequately the existing roads, such as FR 42. Removing the protections of the current rule will increase fire danger, damage sensitive habitats, and harm the flora and fauna that the Forest Service is supposed to protect. At a minimum, I insist that you extend this comment period to at least 90 days and hold hearings across the U.S. in all areas affected, so the public can fully weigh in. This proposal does not have my support. I urge you to choose no-action and uphold the Roadless Rule. I further endorse the comments of the Chiricahua Regional Council submitted separately by that organization. Sincerely, Richard E Webster Sincerely, Richard Webster PO Box 16412 Portal, AZ 85632-0412 webster.re@gmail.com

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless