Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-564131

Opposes rescissionPosted October 5, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “protects many of the remaining habitats”
    • “displaced and endangered species”
    • “protect these lands and the plant and animal species”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “obligation to ourselves and future generations”
    • “species that rely on them for survival”
    • “keep it in place”
  • Climate Carbon Storage
    • “climate is on my mind”
    • “The 2001 Rule has been quietly doing its part of that math”

What it names

National Forests
Mendocino National Forest
Roadless areas
Reister Canyon

Attachments

2 files. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter
  • Own letter

The comment

To the U.S. Forest Service Roadless Rule Docket: I'm writing because climate is on my mind, daily, in a way I didn't sign up for. The 2001 Rule has been quietly doing its part of that math since 2001. Leave it alone. This rule protects many of the remaining habitats for displaced and endangered species. We have an obligation to ourselves and future generations to protect these lands and the plant and animal species that rely on them for survival. Regarding the Reister Canyon in the Mendocino National Forest, California: The Rule should not fall; the Department should act to keep it in place. With thanks, CommentID: RLC-20261005-AZREET

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless