Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-567440

Opposes rescissionPosted October 5, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protecting important buffers”
    • “wildlife habitat”
    • “wild, unfragmented landscapes”
    • “preserve the Roadless Rule”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “irreplaceable opportunities for outdoor recreation”
    • “recreational bicycle use”
    • “hunting carts and other mechanical equipment”
    • “full spectrum of National Forest land use and recreational opportunities”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “provide clean water”
    • “safeguards treasured places”
    • “protecting important buffers”
  • Resource Development Extraction
    • “not opened to greater roadbuilding and commercial logging”
    • “construction of roads and other human infrastructure”
    • “motorized lands open to timbering and other development”

What it names

Roadless areas
Cheat MountainSeneca Creek

The comment

I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. Our national forests are public lands, our shared birthright, and they should be protected for the benefit of everyone, not opened to greater roadbuilding and commercial logging. In West Virginia, the Roadless Rule safeguards treasured places like Roaring Plains, Seneca Creek, Cheat Mountain, Canaan Mountain and Tea Creek, while protecting important buffers around Dolly Sods, Otter Creek and Cranberry. These wild, unfragmented landscapes provide clean water, wildlife habitat and irreplaceable opportunities for outdoor recreation. They are set aside as having potential for wilderness designation. Allowing the construction of roads and other human infrastructure would destroy that potential. Even while not designated, they provide an important alternative in the full spectrum of National Forest land use and recreational opportunities. Roadless areas can be preserved without significant degradation as potential wilderness while still providing opportunities not available in designated wilderness, such as recreational bicycle use and hunting carts and other mechanical equipment not permitted in wilderness. The role of roadless areas as an in-between alternative to full wilderness and motorized lands open to timbering and other development is important and must not be compromised. Once roadless areas are degraded, we cannot easily restore them. Please preserve the Roadless Rule and protect our shared public lands for future generations. Sincerely, David Johnston PO Box 42 Dryfork, WV 26263-0042 dsjohnstonWV@gmail.com

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless