Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. This comment stands for 47 submissions in its group. See the letter, its submissions and topics.
Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.
These results are meant to be shared.
How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.
The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →
The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload.
Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.
© 2026 Roadless.org, Wandering Nature, LLC. All rights reserved.