Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-570372

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “provide essential wildlife habitat”
    • “break up untouched habitat”
    • “protect the forests, wildlife”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “safeguard clean water”
    • “degrade waterways”
    • “protect... clean water”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “support outdoor recreation”
    • “wild places”
    • “keep park ecosystems connected and healthy”

What it names

Roadless areas
Smoky Mountains

The comment

Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, se01nsnn se01nsnn , Please choose the No Action alternative and keep the Roadless Rule in place. This rule protects so many acres of national forest lands, including areas near Yosemite, Yellowstone, and Great Smoky Mountains national parks. These wild places safeguard clean water, provide essential wildlife habitat, support outdoor recreation, and help keep park ecosystems connected and healthy. By rescinding this rule, new roads and development would break up untouched habitat, degrade waterways, and put our parks at risk. Many public lands are already available for timber and energy development. Roadless protections apply to only about 30% of National Forest lands, making these remaining intact areas especially important to keep intact. Please do not move forward with this unnecessary rollback. Keep the Roadless Rule in place to protect the forests, wildlife, clean water, and the national parks. Sue Hammond 2507 Norwalk Court Martinez, CA 94553 Sincerely, Sue Hammond

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless