Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-570961

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Coconino National ForestDixie National ForestFishlake National ForestKaibab National ForestRio Grande National ForestSierra National ForestWhite River National Forest

The comment

I am opposed to changes to the roadless rule. It is a significant measure that has been effective in preserving and managing natural resources, hiking, fishing and hunting opportunities that the public enjoys and support. I have been a visitor to national forest lands in Colorado (Uncompahgre NF, Rio Grande NF, White River NF), Utah (Dixie NF, Fishlake NF), California (Sierra NF, San Gabriel NF, others), Arizona (Coconino NF, Kaibab NF), others. I support the roadless rule and I don’t support eliminating it. Yes, the President’s donors may be trying to benefit from removing the rule, but a majority of the public supports preserving it. Utah politicians like Lee may claim no one supports measures like the roadless rule, but he is undoubtedly pandering to outside interests.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless