Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-570998

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “depend on these watersheds for clean drinking water”
    • “integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “value the pristine wildlife habitats”
    • “Protecting these unfragmented landscapes”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “hike the backcountry trails”
    • “avid user and advocate for our nation's public lands”

What it names

Roadless areas
Smoky Mountains

The comment

To the U.S. Forest Service: I am writing to express my strong opposition to any efforts to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. As an avid user and advocate for our nation’s public lands, I rely heavily on the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. I frequently visit the Smoky Mountains National Park near my home in North Carolina. Protecting these unfragmented landscapes is deeply personal to me because I depend on these watersheds for clean drinking water, hike the backcountry trails, and value the pristine wildlife habitats. I urge the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to abandon the proposed rescission and instead maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment. Sincerely, Zack Eller

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless