Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-571679

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protect endangered species and their habitat”
    • “wildlife that calls it home”
    • “possible destruction of these areas”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “allow access for the American people”
    • “drive many back roads”
    • “wild beauty of the landscape”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “The Roadless Rule was enacted for a reason”
    • “lack of regulation allows for certain entities to act against the intentions”
    • “It is extremely important to keep the Roadless Rule”

What it names

National Forests
Lincoln National Forest

The comment

The Roadless Rule was enacted for a reason; because lack of regulation allows for certain entities to act against the intentions of why these land were protected in the first place: to allow access for the American people, protect endangered species and their habitat, and also to allow timber harvesting and development when it does not negatively affect the conservation goals. Having worked in Lincoln National Forest, I had the opportunity to drive many back roads and see the wild beauty of the landscape and the wildlife that calls it home. Removing regulations and allowing the possible destruction of these areas would be a travesty. It is extremely important to keep the Roadless Rule. Please keep it in effect for the benefit of future generations. Thank you, Brian

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless