I oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Water from national forest country in the Eastern Region of the Allegheny National forest reaches as many as 3,819,600 people downstream, by the agency’s own data. I am one of them. Fully or partially rescinding the Roadless Rule under Alternatives 2 and 3 of the draft EIS would be a grave mistake. Again, I oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I urge the U.S. Forest Service to select Alternative 1 (the No Action alternative) in the draft Environmental Impact Statement and keep the 2001 Roadless Rule fully intact. Thank you.