Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-573540

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “fragile ecosystems need the safeguards”
    • “safeguards against industrial logging”
    • “safeguards against road building”
    • “safeguards against commercial development”

What it names

National Forests
Stanislaus National Forest

The comment

Regarding Docket No. FS-2025-0001 and RIN 0596-AD66: I STRONGLY OPPOSE repealing the Roadless Rule. I own a home near the Stanislaus National Forest. Its fragile ecosystems need the safeguards against industrial logging, road building, and commercial development that the Roadless Rule provides.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless