Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-573653

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “beautiful old growth trees”
    • “pristine waterways”
    • “animals, flora and fauna that are treasured”
    • “loss of habitat that would bring to this area would be devastating”
  • Resource Development Extraction
    • “additional roads in this area will lead to additional logging”
    • “No doubt additional roads in this area will lead to additional logging”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “hiking trails”
    • “cabin owner that leases land”
    • “treasured in this area”

What it names

National Forests
Gifford Pinchot National Forest

The comment

My name is Cheryl Thramer and I live in beautiful. Washington State. I am a cabin owner that leases land in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest right near the Trapper Creek Wilderness area. My grandfather built a cabin on this tract in the 60s. There are cabins that have been in this area since the 20s. This area is full of beautiful old growth trees, pristine waterways, hiking trails, animals, flora and fauna that are treasured in this area. Please do not get rid of the roadless rule. No doubt additional roads in this area will lead to additional logging. The loss of habitat that would bring to this area would be devastating.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless