Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-573803

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “depend on these watersheds for clean drinking water”
    • “integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “avid user of and advocate for our nation's public lands”
    • “frequently hike the backcountry trails”
    • “cherish the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “Protecting these unfragmented landscapes”
    • “maintain full protections for all currently designated, inventoried roadless areas”

What it names

Roadless areas
Craggy Mountain

The comment

Dear U.S. Forest Service: I am writing to express my vehement opposition to any efforts to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. As an avid user of and advocate for our nation's public lands, I rely on and cherish the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. I frequently visit the Craggy Mountain Wilderness near my home in Asheville, North Carolina. Protecting these unfragmented landscapes is deeply personal to me both becuause I depend on these watersheds for clean drinking water and I frequently hike the backcountry trails. I beseech the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to permanently scrap the proposed rescission, and instead maintain full protections for all currently designated, inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment. Best, Hunter

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless