Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-574330

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “devastate public lands”
    • “fragment wildlife habitat”
    • “spread invasive species”
    • “biodiversity they provide”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “filter and store clean drinking water”
    • “undermine the water”
    • “clean water”
  • Climate Carbon Storage
    • “critical carbon sinks”
    • “mitigating the worsening impacts of climate change”
    • “climate resilience”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “recreation opportunities on which millions of Americans depend”
    • “People hike, forage, bike, fish, camp, ski, climb”
    • “find solace in these remote places”

What it names

Works cited
10.1016/j.biocon.2026.11195010.1186/s42408-026-00450-2

The comment

Dear Secretary Rollins, Hi. My name is Kimberly and I love being outside. In fact, just this year, I’ve visited 5 National Parks. I’m so grateful they exist. This country is great because of how incredible and wild our parks are. I strongly oppose the USDA’s proposal to eliminate or weaken the Roadless Rule. This reckless action would devastate public lands, waste taxpayer resources, and undermine the water, wildlife habitat, and recreation opportunities on which millions of Americans depend. Roadless forests represent some of the most intact, resilient ecosystems left in our country. They filter and store clean drinking water, provide refuge for vulnerable species, and serve as critical carbon sinks critical to mitigating the worsening impacts of climate change. People hike, forage, bike, fish, camp, ski, climb, and find solace in these remote places. Roads spread invasive species, fragment wildlife habitat, and erode the very ecological resilience we need in the face of a warming climate. More roads in the backcountry also mean more fires: research shows wildfires are more likely to ignite near roads. Once roads and clearcuts fragment these landscapes, the damage is permanent. Weakening or repealing the Roadless Rule would be a grave mistake. I do not support any of the proposed action alternatives that roll back the Roadless Rule. I urge the USDA to abandon this misguided effort and instead strengthen its commitment to protecting America’s roadless forests for the clean water, climate resilience, recreation, and biodiversity they provide. Leave the Roadless Rule in place. References: Aplet, G.H., Hartger, P. & Dietz, M.S. Three-decade record of contiguous-U.S. national forest wildfires indicates increased density of ignitions near roads. fire ecol 22, 8 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-026-00450-2 Mildrexler, D.J., Berner, L.T., Law, B.E. & Both, M.S. Roadless rule rescission threatens highest integrity forest ecosystems in the United States. Biological Conservation 321, 111950 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111950 Sincerely, Kimberly Fisher Burbank, CA 91506-1540 kimbernfish@gmail.com

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless