“transfer protection decisions to local forest plans”
“susceptible to political pressure”
“short-term exploitation”
The comment
I am strongly against USDA’s plan to overturn the 2001 Roadless Rule.
Roadless national forests represent some of the last pristine public forest landscapes we have. They ensure clean drinking water, provide wildlife habitats, support salmon streams, preserve old-growth forests, and offer spaces for outdoor recreation. These areas are essential for communities, Tribal Nations, and future generations. Once new roads, logging, and industrial activities fragment them, the damage is irreversible.
I have hiked in these forest for more than 50 years. They are necessary for my physical and mental health. Don’t ruin them!
Moreover, I am worried that rescinding the rule would transfer protection decisions to local forest plans, making intact forests more susceptible to political pressure and short-term exploitation. Public forests should be managed for clean water, biodiversity, climate resilience, Indigenous stewardship, and public welfare, not opened up for additional roadbuilding and logging.
Please withdraw the proposed rescission, maintain the 2001 Roadless Rule, and select the strongest alternative to protect roadless areas within the National Forest System.
Please do not ruin an irreplaceable asset!
Thank you for considering my comment.
Bonnie L. Mitchell
Long-term resident of SW UT, currently in Taylorsville, UT 84123