Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-575930

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “Clean Water and Watersheds”
    • “safeguard essential headwaters and drinking water sources”
    • “Bull Run Watershed supplies drinking water”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “Roads fragment ecosystems”
    • “disrupting sensitive wildlife corridors”
    • “protecting endangered species”
  • Climate Carbon Storage
    • “Intact forests act as natural carbon sinks”
    • “more resilient to severe disturbances”
    • “pristine backcountry to industrial/commercial logging”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “hike, forage (where permitted) and enjoy deep solitude”
    • “incredible natural landscapes are worth protecting”
    • “KEEP THESE LANDS, ANIMALS, WATER AND FRESH AIR”

What it names

National Forests
Gifford Pinchot National ForestMt. Hood National Forest

The comment

Agency: FOREST SERVICE (FS) Document Type: Proposed Rule Title: Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation Document ID: FS-2025-0001-223869 Comment: Subject: Opposition to the Proposed Rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule – Docket No. FS-2025-0001 To the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture: I strongly oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (Docket FS-2025-0001). I frequently visit my daughter in Portland and we always schedule a trip either to Mt. Hood National Forest, Gifford Pinchot National Forest, Mt. St. Helens National Monument, Mark o. Hatfield Wilderness, Suislaw National Forest or other areas throughout the Pacific Northwest. I feel a special kinship with these areas, where we hike, forage (where permitted) and enjoy deep solitude. These incredible natural landscapes are worth protecting, for several critical reasons: • Clean Water and Watersheds: Roadless areas safeguard essential headwaters and drinking water sources for downstream communities. This is especially true for the Portland metro area; the Bull Run Watershed supplies drinking water to nearly one million residents. • Wildlife Habitat: Roads fragment ecosystems, disrupting sensitive wildlife corridors. More roads are a threat to preserving or restoring biodiversity and protecting endangered species. • Climate and Resilience: Intact forests act as natural carbon sinks and are more resilient to severe disturbances than fragmented, heavily managed timber lands. Shifting management decisions to local forest plans without a national safeguard risks opening millions of acres of pristine backcountry to industrial/commercial logging and road construction. We have seen what happens when national protections are disregarded; wanton destruction of huge swaths of land with major downstream impacts to fish, wildlife, and even human habitation (when near poorly managed forests). I urge the Forest Service to select Alternative 1 (No Action) and maintain a continuation of full, nationwide protections for all designated inventoried roadless areas. This action would maintain current prohibitions against road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting across roughly 44.7 million acres of inventoried roadless areas on national forest lands. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this critical ruling. KEEP THESE LANDS, ANIMALS, WATER AND FRESH AIR FOR OUR CHILDREN'S CHILDREN AND THEIR CHILDREN!!! Adele Garger, Thousand Palms CA.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless