Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-576512

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protection depends on the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule remaining in place”
    • “lakes and forests I am describing here”
    • “roadless areas of Wisconsin's Chequamegon-Nicolet”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “places I care about”
    • “Bear Swamp in Michigan's Huron-Manistee National Forest”
    • “Wheeler Lake Islands, Shoe Lake Islands, Shelp Lake, Perch Lake, and Foursection”

What it names

National Forests
Huron-Manistee National Forest
Roadless areas
Bear Swamp

The comment

The lakes and forests I am describing here, Bear Swamp in Michigan's Huron-Manistee National Forest and the roadless areas of Wisconsin's Chequamegon-Nicolet, including Wheeler Lake Islands, Shoe Lake Islands, Shelp Lake, Perch Lake, and Foursection, are places I care about, and I am filing this comment because their protection depends on the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule remaining in place. I oppose its rescission.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless