Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-576546

Supports rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “wildfire risk”
    • “hazardous-fuels treatment”
    • “vegetation management”
    • “wildfire response”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “recreational motorcycle riding”
    • “OHV recreation”
    • “responsible public access”
    • “recreation demand”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “returning management decisions... to local Forest Service officials”
    • “forest-level planning”
    • “removes an additional nationwide prohibition”
    • “returns these decisions to appropriate local planning”

What it names

National Forests
Sequoia National Forest

The comment

RE: Support for Rescission of the Roadless Rule, Docket FS-2025-0001, RIN: 0596-AD66 Dear U.S. Forest Service: As an OHV enthusiast and public-land recreationist, I strongly support rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. As a avid user of the Sequoia National Forest for recreational motorcycle riding with my family, I support returning management decisions for inventoried roadless areas to local Forest Service officials who can evaluate actual forest conditions, wildfire risk, community needs, recreation demand, and environmental resources through forest-level planning. As a member of the Stewards of the Sequoia’s and a participant in trail maintenance I strongly believe recession can restore important tools for hazardous-fuels treatment, vegetation management, habitat restoration, wildfire response, and responsible public access. Roads and trails also provide critical access for firefighters, OHV recreation, camping, hunting, fishing, families, older Americans, and people with disabilities. Importantly, rescission does not mandate road construction or timber harvest. Future projects remain subject to applicable forest plans and environmental laws. Rescission simply removes an additional nationwide prohibition and returns these decisions to appropriate local planning. I urge the Forest Service to finalize rescission of the 2001 Roadless Rule and direct all national forest units to immediately re-evaluate land management, travel management, and project-level Plans to restore access routes that have been closed or restricted as a result of the Roadless Rule. Sincerely, Tim Nowak Yorba Linda , CA

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless