Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-577304

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “harm it would do to the habitats of the animals that live there”
    • “keep our public lands wild”
    • “tarnish the small amount of wild land our country has left”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “I enjoy using the public lands for hiking”
    • “the scenery of my hikes would suffer”
    • “public lands wild”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “More roads and more logging isn't the right answer here”
    • “keep our public lands wild”
    • “harm it would do to the habitats”

What it names

National Forests
Sierra National Forest

The comment

Please keep our public lands wild. Rescinding the roadless rule would tarnish the small amount of wild land our country has left. I live near Sierra National Forest, and I enjoy using the public lands for hiking. If the government rescinds the roadless rule, the scenery of my hikes would suffer, but that is nothing compared to the harm it would do to the habitats of the animals that live there. “A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit.” Rescinding the roadless rule is in direct conflict with this proverb. More roads and more logging isn’t the right answer here.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless