Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-577613

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “human-caused fire ignitions occurred adjacent to roads”
    • “more roads will mean more human-caused fires”
    • “didn't make sense, economically or environmentally to build roads there”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “roadless for a reason”
    • “didn't make sense, economically or environmentally to build roads there”

What it names

National Forests
Coconino National Forest

The comment

I'm a retired USFS employee who worked on the original Roadless Rule. I worked on the Coconino NF, which is heavily roaded already. - The areas defined as "roadless" were roadless for a reason.... it didn't make sense, economically or environmentally to build roads there. - Recent Coconino NF research indicated most human-caused fire ignitions occurred adjacent to roads. So more roads will mean more human-caused fires.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless