Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-578820

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “quality of my drinking water to be compromised”
    • “Wild spaces are important in keeping water naturally clean”
    • “Potential timber production can leak sediment into the watersheds”
    • “California has 1,034 municipal watersheds in the 4,389,760 acres of roadless areas”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “herons and egrets I watch near the American River”
    • “regions of the American river staying intact”
    • “greenery behind it”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “pictures I take of the river, shore, and greenery”
    • “watch near the American River”

What it names

Roadless areas
Middle Fork

The comment

The herons and egrets I watch near the American River, and the pictures I take of the river, shore, and greenery behind it, depend on the North Fork and North Fork Middle Fork regions of the American river staying intact under the 2001 Roadless Rule. I don’t want the quality of my drinking water to be compromised. Wild spaces are important in keeping water naturally clean. I would rather have that, than constantly boil and filter drinking water. California has 1,034 municipal watersheds in the 4,389,760 acres of roadless areas. Potential timber production can leak sediment into the watersheds. I ask the agency to explain how rescinding the Roadless Rule would leave watersheds unharmed. Sincerely, Raina Bahadur

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless