Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-581021

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Gallatin National Forest

The comment

We do not need to further damage the areas that have been set aside for protection. There need to be places where natural integrity is maintained and not utilized and degraded by every available means. Maintain the Roadless Rule. I am a retired US Forest Service Reforestation Forester for the Gallatin NF. Timber harvesting can adequately provided from other NF lands and private lands. I am also strongly supportive of visitation to national forests that have the seemingly unique opportunity to enjoy some silence in these hyper times. Do NOT rescind the Roadless Rule!

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless