Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-581049

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Exact copy — Byte-identical to another submission. This comment stands for 2 submissions in its group.

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Environmental Protection Biodiversity
- “protect and enhance our federal lands”
- “Future generations need us to protect these forests”
- “We do not need more roads”
Resource Development Extraction
- “We do not need more forest products”
- “saw timber prices are already too low”

What it names

Works cited: Johnston et al. 2023

The comment

We do not need more roads to protect and enhance our federal lands. We do not need more forest products -- saw timber prices are already too low. Future generations need us to protect these forests. I strongly oppose this proposed action!