Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-581491

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

The comment

I oppose the attempt to repeal the Roadless Rule, because it will lead to more human-caused wildfires, less clean water, and damage the natural beauty of these areas. An often used argument for more roads is that it will allow us to more effectively fight wildfires, but this is a fallacy. If built, these roads will allow for more human-caused ignitions as more people and corporations misuse these areas. With disgust at the attempt, Jarod Contreras Grover Beach, CA 93433

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless