Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-581909

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “avid climber, hiker and cross country skier”
    • “enjoyment by future generations”
    • “negative impacts the rule change will have”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “Preservation of these wildernes areas is critical”
    • “Quilicene on the Olympic Peninsula”
    • “Liberty Bell in the North Cascades”

What it names

Roadless areas
Liberty Bell

The comment

I am writing to oppose proposed changes to the Roadless Rule. I am a Washington state avid climber, hiker and cross country skier. I am particularly concerned about how he negative impacts the rule change will have on the Quilicene on the Olympic Peninsula and Liberty Bell in the North Cascades, Preservation of these wildernes areas is critical to their enjoyment by future generations.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless