Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-584590

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protect and preserve the diversity and uniqueness of flora, fauna, and ecosystems”
    • “prevent them from extinction”
    • “balance and interdependence of the seven major groups of animals”
    • “silent spring without birdsong”
  • Resource Development Extraction
    • “opened to roadbuilding, land development will follow”
    • “destroy any chance of further conservation”
    • “Not everything is about money, private-sector business, and profit”

What it names

Works cited
Andrews et al. 2015

The comment

Do not loosen or eliminate existing roadless conservation. There are reasons for conserving roadless areas: to protect and preserve the diversity and uniqueness of flora, fauna, and ecosystems to prevent them from extinction. Once gone, there is no turning back. Imagine the United States without forests, creeks, springs, ferns, grasses, flowers, undergrowth; dominance hierarchies or pecking orders; the balance and interdependence of the seven major groups of animals that are mammals, birds, fish, reptiles, amphibians, insects, and other invertebrates. The silent spring without birdsong. If some or much of the current special areas designated roadless area conservation are opened to roadbuilding, land development will follow and destroy any chance of further conservation. Not everything is about money, private-sector business, and profit. Do not loosen or eliminate existing roadless conservation.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless