Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-584603

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “spent extensive time recreating in our public lands”
    • “National Forest Roadless Areas”
    • “San Joaquin IRA in Inyo NF”
    • “Eagle IRA in Mt Hood NF”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “will not believe the claims about needing to repeal the rule for better fire management”
    • “90% of fires are started within 1/2 mile of a road”
    • “Roadless Areas have not burned at significantly higher rates or severity”
    • “in the most recent decade, they actually burned less”
  • Public Opinion Support
    • “The American public supports wilderness areas”
    • “we will not believe the claims”

What it names

National Forests
Inyo National Forest
Roadless areas
San Joaquin

The comment

I oppose the repeal of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I have spent extensive time recreating in our public lands, including in National Forest Roadless Areas. Some of the roadless areas most important to me are the San Joaquin IRA in Inyo NF and the Eagle IRA in Mt Hood NF. The American public supports wilderness areas and we will not believe the claims about needing to repeal the rule for better fire management. 90% of fires are started within 1/2 mile of a road, and analysis has found that Roadless Areas have not burned at significantly higher rates or severity than forest lands with roads (and in the most recent decade, they actually burned less). We already have 370,000 miles of forest roads with a multi-billion dollar maintenance backlog - let's not create more.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless