Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 4/24Owed an answerPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov
Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.
Scorecard
Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.
Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.
How hard it is to set aside
A1 strong: Must be answered — it names the law.
Owed an answer on Legal.
Standard dismissals it defeats
Already addressedThe agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
No cause and effect shownThe agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
Certified not substantiveThe agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.
Still open to the agency
Alternative already eliminatedThe agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
Deferred to a later decisionThe agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
Misreads the proposalThe agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
Not requiredThe agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
Preference notedThe agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
Outside the scopeThe agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
To: U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture
Re: Opposition to the Proposed Rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (36 CFR Part 294)
Dear Forest Service Officials,
I am writing this comment/letter as an Undergraduate Student participating in an Introduction to Ecology and Behavior Class. Although I have taken the beauty of nature and the outdoors for granted, I will not idlily standby and strongly oppose the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s proposed rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Cutting this vital protection threatens over 44 million acres of undisturbed National Forest lands, which risk irreplaceable headwaters, biodiversity, and outdoor recreation corridors across the nation. As someone who has visited protected National Parks such as Yosemite, I have experienced firsthand the beauty of wildlife, its mystifying atmosphere, and contiguous need to admire such natural product. From an ecological perspective, roadless, non-touched forests are extremely essential for landscape connectivity, species, preservation, and watershed protections that keep the environment strong. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement fails to show how removing protection serves the long-term benefit of not only the public interest, but additionally our ecosystem. I urge the Forest Service to reconsider this rescission and maintain the the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule.
Thank you for considering my public comment.
Respectfully submitted,
UC Undergraduate