Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-585166

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “keep the Roadless Rule intact”
    • “majestic landscapes that we have preserved”
    • “wild lands are an irreplaceable jewel”
    • “retain the existing Roadless Rule protections”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “utilizing Alternative 1 in the current DEIS”
    • “Roadless Rule has provided consistent, nationwide protections”
    • “Forest Service should not weaken those protections”

The comment

The Forest Service should keep the Roadless Rule intact exactly as it is, utilizing Alternative 1 in the current DEIS. I am deeply concerned about the proposal to rescind the Roadless Rule. These lands are a huge part of what makes America a great nation. Few other civilazations on earth still have the kind of magestic landscapes that we have preserved here, and if we squander them now, after all these years, what will we have left to pass on to our grandchildren? When we talk about our national debt, it is also important to acknowledge our national wealth, and our wild lands are an irreplaceable jewel we can never replace. Once gone, they will be gone forever. The Roadless Rule has provided consistent, nationwide protections for these special places for decades. The Forest Service should not weaken those protections or open currently protected roadless lands to new development. I urge the Forest Service to pursue Alternative 1 and retain the existing Roadless Rule protections. Sincerely, Susan Zeman 5026 Renton Ave S Apt 113 Seattle, WA 98118-1975 susanzeman8@gmail.com

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless