Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-585561

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “public lands should continue to be valued and protected”
    • “beautiful and important ecosystems”
    • “impacted by the elimination or weakening of the roadless rule”

The comment

Dear Secretary Rollins, Our public lands should continue to be valued and protected. It would be heartbreaking to see the beautiful and important ecosystems that they contain be impacted by the elimination or weakening of the roadless rule. I don’t support it, and I urge the USDA to leave the roadless rule in place. Sincerely, Aneesa Winn Portland, OR 97218-3149 thetreechic@gmail.com

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless