Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-585877

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “disrupt the migration patterns (corridors) of large and small animals”
    • “problematic to the habits and habitat of wildlife”
    • “shrinking them to an unsustainable sizes for adequate population viability”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “Degradation of the forest floor disrupts water runoff patterns”
    • “leads to erosion issues”
    • “has impacts on the aquafers”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “corruption of the forest buffers around our National Parks”
    • “greater environmental and ecological stresses on these national treasures”

The comment

Good morning, I am writing to implore that you not, absolutely not, rescind the Roadless Rule in our National Forests. Bring human activity. They also disrupt the migration patterns (corridors) of large and small animals. The construction of roads, their use and upkeep require human activity as well as alteration of terrain. All of this is problematic to the habits and habitat of wildlife who then have to migrate further from the margins of their territories; thus shrinking them to an unsustainable sizes for adequate population viability. Degradation of the forest floor disrupts water runoff patterns, leads to erosion issues and has impacts on the aquafers. The end point is corruption of the forest buffers around our National Parks and greater environmental and ecological stresses on these national treasures. Do not rescind the "Roadless Rule". Lawrence Schissel Newport, NH 03773

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless