Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-586466

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “reversing these protections”
    • “devastating impact on some of the last of the protected land we have left”
    • “leaving our trees to stand”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “Cheat Mountain... is like a second home to me”
    • “Beloved to scores of people... who... visit as they pass through”
    • “Please preserve our true HOME”

What it names

Roadless areas
Cheat Mountain

The comment

To whom it may concern, I am a lifelong resident of Morgantown, WV and a lover of our precious forests, in and outside of her borders. Cheat Mountain, one of countless sites that would be impacted by reversing these protections, is like a second home to me. Beloved to scores of people (and animals) who not only live in this area, but visit as they pass through, lifting these protections would have a devastating impact on some of the last of the protected land we have left. West Virginia. Mountain Mama. Our homes aren't structures with four walls - they are the hills. They are the mountains. They are the trees. They are the rivers. Please preserve our true HOME. I beg you NOT to reverse this rule, keeping construction out of these areas, and leaving our trees to stand. Citizen and voter, Elissa Momen

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless