Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-587425

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protecting all forests which are old and undisturbed by logging”
    • “destruction of old forest”
    • “pristine forest is now destroyed”
  • Resource Development Extraction
    • “do not want roads being built in forested areas”
    • “prevent new roads being built on our forest land”
    • “undisturbed by logging”

What it names

National Forests
Daniel Boone National Forest

The comment

As a citizen and rightful co-owner of our national forests, I do not want roads being built in forested areas that do not already have roads. I am particularly interested in protecting all forests which are old and undisturbed by logging. I just witnessed the destruction of old forest in Redbird forest, Daniel Boone National Forest. It is a travesty that this forest was decimated. A small pocket of pristine forest is now destroyed by legalese and tarnished flawed methods. Do not change any guidelines that exist now that help prevent new roads being built on our forest land.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless