Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-587692

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protecting Florida's national forests”
    • “imperiling wildlife and plants”
    • “squeezed by overdevelopment”
    • “value its' contributions to the environment”

What it names

National Forests
Apalachicola National Forest

The comment

I am opposed to rescinding the rules protecting Florida's national forests by the proposed rollback of protections from the Trump administration, further imperiling wildlife and plants already squeezed by overdevelopment. I live very near the Apalachicola National Forest and value its' contributions to the environment of the area.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless