Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-587912

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests
Roadless areas
Green MountainLye Brook Addition 09085

The comment

Dear Secretary Brooke L. Rollins: I am commenting because I care about the roadless areas of this country and I think that they need to be protected. Regarding the Lye Brook Addition 09085 in the Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests, Vermont: New road construction, reconstruction, and associated development fragment habitat, introduce disturbance, and eliminate roadless character. Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the Lye Brook Addition 09085, Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests to road construction and associated ground disturbance. The direct and indirect effects of that activity are precisely what makes a specific comment about this area necessary. If this rule is rescinded I lose a beautiful place to find peace and inspiration in We need to keep the roadless rule because it helps to protect the wild areas of this country for the plants, animals and people. For the reasons set forth in this comment, the proposed rescission should not proceed. With appreciation, CommentID: RLC-20261006-CG5IKT

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless