Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-588488

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “keep the Roadless Rule in place”
    • “protect the forests, wildlife”
    • “migrating birds that pass every migration season”
    • “preserve land for people and wildlife alike”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “clean water”
    • “protect the forests, wildlife, clean water”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “people who enjoy them and take peace in being among towering trees”
    • “protected lands mean more than ever”

The comment

Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, se01nsnn se01nsnn , I urge you to choose the No Action alternative and keep the Roadless Rule in place. Our public land is not for sale! With the ever increasing human population and urbanization these protected lands mean more than ever! For the people who enjoy them and take peace in being among towering trees to migrating birds that pass every migration season. The roadless rule helps preserve land for people and wildlife alike. PLEASE do not move forward with this unnecessary rollback. Keep the Roadless Rule in place to protect the forests, wildlife, clean water, and the national parks. AND YOUR PEOPLE OF THE US Jasmine Rivera 20483 kilbourn rd Harlingen, TX 78550 Sincerely, Jasmine Rivera

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless