Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-588594

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “maintain this natural beauty so it can exist forever for everyone to enjoy”
    • “enjoys the fresh air”
    • “peace of mind found through walks at some of my favorite hiking spots”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “clean drinking water”
    • “no large commerce operations such as logging / energy generation to disturb this natural beauty”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “maintain this natural beauty”
    • “no large commerce operations such as logging / energy generation to disturb this natural beauty”

What it names

Roadless areas
Little River

The comment

I support alternative 1 and to keep the Roadless Rule so that we can maintain this natural beauty so it can exist forever for everyone to enjoy. I am a young taxpayer who enjoys the fresh air, clean drinking water and peace of mind found through walks at some of my favorite hiking spots at Reddish Knob, Little River, and Shenandoah Mountain. I appreciate that there is no large commerce operations such as logging / energy generation to disturb this natural beauty.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless