Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-588808

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “wild animals have areas in which are left untouched”
    • “eliminating animals that thrive in their natural environments”
    • “areas previously untouched and should be protected”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “concern about opening more forest areas by creating roads”
    • “destroy our wilderness”
    • “areas that are wilderness areas”
  • Public Health Wellbeing
    • “spray documented cancer causing poisons on our forests”
    • “What can , will we leave for future generations?”

What it names

National Forests
Tongass National Forest
Law cited
36 CFR 29466 FR 3244Executive Order 14153

The comment

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is initiating rulemaking concerning management of inventoried roadless areas on approximately 44.7 million acres of National Forest System lands, including in Alaska. The proposed rule would rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions. State-specific roadless rules for Idaho and Colorado at 36 CFR 294 subparts C and D will be retained. Rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule is intended to return decision-making for road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvest in inventoried roadless areas to local officials, in conjunction with Forest-level land management planning. As directed by Executive Order 14153: Unleashing Alaska’s Extraordinary Resource Potential, the proposed rule will expressly exclude the Tongass National Forest from the 2001 Roadless Rule. I live in a forested area which has many logging roads. I understand logging is important. It might help in forest health and in the natural resources our forests supply. I am writing today to express my concern about opening more forest areas by creating roads into areas that are wilderness areas and areas previously untouched and should be protected. I am firmly against more roads into areas our forests! What can , will we leave for future generations? Why can’t our wild animals have areas in which are left untouched by creating more roads? The present govt administration is hell bent on cutting down our forests, eliminating animals that thrive in their natural environments, spray documented cancer causing poisons on our forests and generally destroy our wilderness! Hands off our forests!

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless