Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-591646

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Exact copy — Byte-identical to another submission. This comment stands for 2 submissions in its group.

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Water Quality Quantity
- “headwater streams that sustain sensitive trout fisheries”
- “essential for watershed health”
- “roadless drainages of the Uintas”
Wildlife Habitat
- “sustain sensitive trout fisheries”
- “maintaining large, undeveloped tracts of public land”
- “retaining the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule”
Governance Policy Process
- “support of Alternative 1 (No Action)”
- “urge the U.S. Forest Service to adopt Alternative 1”
- “retain the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule”

What it names

National Forests: Ashley National Forest

The comment

I am writing in support of Alternative 1 (No Action) and retaining the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I am a retired fish biologist. I have lived in Vernal, Utah since 1987 and enjoy trout fishing in the Ashley National Forest. The roadless drainages of the Uintas contain headwater streams that sustain sensitive trout fisheries. Maintaining large, undeveloped tracts of public land is essential for watershed health and maintenance of these fisheries. I respectfully urge the U.S. Forest Service to adopt Alternative 1 (No Action) and retain the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Respectfully Submitted, G. Bruce Haines