Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-591902

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

Roadless areas
Smoky Mountains

The comment

Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, se01nsnn se01nsnn , As a U.S. citizen who cares deeply about national parks and the public lands that sustain them, I urge all legislators to choose the No Action alternative and uphold the existing Roadless Rule. Prior Congressmen and women put the rule in place more than 20 years ago to protect roughly 44.7 million acres of ecologically intact national forest lands, including areas near Yosemite, Yellowstone, and Great Smoky Mountains national parks. Their wisdom has protected wild places, safeguarded clean water, provided essential wildlife habitat, supported outdoor recreation, and helped keep park ecosystems connected and healthy. We call on our current leaders to uphold their commitment. Rescinding the rule would expose these treasured landscapes to new roads and development, fragmenting habitat, degrading waterways, and putting our parks at risk. Many public lands are already available for timber and energy development. Roadless protections apply to only about 30% of National Forest lands, making these remaining intact areas especially important for future generations. Please do not move forward with this unnecessary rollback. Keep the Roadless Rule in place to protect the forests, wildlife, clean water, and the national parks. Rebecca Ragan 15841 Fourmile Creek Ct Haymarket, VA 20169 Sincerely, Rebecca Ragan

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless