Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-592606

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “puts wildlife habitat... at risk”
    • “retain protections for Florida's national forests”
    • “preserve for future generations”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “water quality... at risk”
    • “retain protections for Florida's national forests”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “natural character of these public lands at risk”
    • “oppose the proposed rollback”
    • “preserve for future generations”

What it names

National Forests
Apalachicola National Forest

The comment

Please retain protections for Florida’s national forests. I oppose the proposed rollback of the Roadless Rule and urge you to retain these protections for Florida’s national forests, including the Apalachicola National Forest near my home in Wakulla County. Opening protected areas to additional logging and road construction puts wildlife habitat, water quality, and the natural character of these public lands at risk. These forests belong to all of us and should be preserved for future generations. Please keep the Roadless Rule in place. Sue Damon Wakulla County, Florida

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless