Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-594961

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “Please leave existing areas roadless”
    • “We need wild places now more than extractive resources”
    • “support alternative #1”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “The argument that these new roads will help reduce wildfires overall is just plain bogus”
    • “lot of forest road maintenance that the USFS is not able to keep up with”

What it names

National Forests
Sierra National Forest

The comment

I am impressed with the speed and effort in the recent of repair Garnet Dike Road in the Sierra National Forest. I also understand that there is a large backlog Great work to repair Garnet Dike Road, but I do know that there is a lot of forest road maintenance that the USFS is not able to keep up with. As for the Roadless Area Conservation Rule of 2001, I support alternative #1. Please leave existing areas roadless. The argument that these new roads will help reduce wildfires overall is just plain bogus. We need wild places now more than extractive resources.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless