Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-594991

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Attachments

1 file. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter

The comment

Date: October 6, 2026 To: Public Comments Processing Attn: Docket No. FS-2025-0001 U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20250 Subject: Public Comment on Proposed Rule: Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation (Docket ID: FS-2025-0001 / RIN 0596-AD61) To Whom It May Concern: I strongly oppose the repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule.The rule has broad bipartisan support throughout the electorate. About 99% of submitted comments regarding the recent proposed repeal have urged backcountry protection to remain in place. Findings from the USDA’s own draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) indicate that repealing the rule is likely to cause economic and environmental harm. More roads will increase human caused wildfire risks, harm old growth forests and degrade water quality due to increased runoff. On Sept 3, 2026 a bipartisan group of 164 US Senators and Representatives sent a letter to Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, in support of the Roadless Rule. New roads in Wilderness Areas will fragment and degrade habitats, increasing blockage of seasonal migrations, thus causing a decline in species abundance. In 1863, in the Gettysburg Address, President Lincoln said: "...and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." Please listen to the people and allow the Roadless Rule to stand!

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless