Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-595780

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Pisgah National Forest
Roadless areas
Wilson Creek

The comment

I oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. As a citizen who regularly visits and uses Pisgah National Forest (commonly Wilson Creek and Old Fort areas, among many others), I clearly understand that rescission of this rule would impact wildlife, clean drinking water, and recreation. It would also increase fire risk, add costs to an already financially strapped Forest Service, and increase the impact of invasive species. Public opinion has consistently been documented to be against diminishing roadless areas, and for their ongoing protection.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless