Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-596515

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Routt National Forest
Roadless areas
Pagoda Peak

The comment

Dear Chief Tom Schultz: As someone who has navigated public land on foot for most of my adult life, I know what the absence of roads does for a place. Losing roadless spaces deprives people like me of a place to escape the near-ubiquitous sound of motors and impact of vehicles. Regarding the Pagoda Peak in the Routt NF, Colorado: New road construction, reconstruction, and associated development fragment habitat, introduce disturbance, and eliminate roadless character. Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the Pagoda Peak, Routt NF to road construction and associated ground disturbance. The direct and indirect effects of that activity are precisely what makes a specific comment about this area necessary. Roadless areas have a character all their own. There is a stillness, an undisturbed quality, and a solitude that is destroyed by the intrusion of roads. Keep the Roadless Rule on the books. With kind regards, CommentID: RLC-20261006-DOHR5Q

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless