Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-596550

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

The comment

I am writing in opposition to the proposal to rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. This rule should remain in place. Our wild lands are a part of who we are as Americans. They provide habitat for our wildlife, ensure clean water, allow for backcountry recreation opportunities, and preserve spaces unpolluted, undisturbed, undestroyed by human encroachment. These preserved spaces are vital to our own continuation as a species—clean water and air, and the basic elements of the food chain that keep us fed begin there. Rescinding the roadless rule is a shortsighted step toward our own destruction. Sincerely, Rhonda Conley, Everett, WA 98203

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless