Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-596981

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Recreation Tourism Public Use
- “loved experiences in the landscapes this rule protects”
- “hiked and camped in the Custer Gallatin National Forest”
- “camped and driven through the Caribou-Targhee National Forest”
- “provide the same experiences for my children and grandchildren”
Environmental Protection Biodiversity
- “should not build roads as it would ruin the serene scenery”
- “once a road is built the experience is gone forever”
- “beautiful”

What it names

National Forests: Caribou-Targhee National Forest Gallatin National Forest

Attachments

3 files. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

Own letter
Own letter
Own letter

The comment

I am opposed to the recision of the rule. I have personally had loved experiences in the landscapes this rule protects and hoping to provide the same experiences for my children and grandchildren. I have hiked and camped in the Custer Gallatin National Forest in Montana, and camped and driven through the Caribou-Targhee National Forest on the Idaho-Wyoming border. They are beautiful. These places should not build roads as it would ruin the serene scenery; once a road is built the experience is gone forever.